<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Observe Business &#187; Advertising Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://observebusiness.com/category/advertising-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://observebusiness.com</link>
	<description>Observations on Business, Government Policy, and Strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:56:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Budget rent-a-car&#8217;s confusing &#8216;Street Fleet&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://observebusiness.com/budget-rent-a-cars-confusing-street-fleet/</link>
		<comments>http://observebusiness.com/budget-rent-a-cars-confusing-street-fleet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 09:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vicparekh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Product Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Website Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget car rental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car rental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street fleet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observebusiness.com/?p=452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Budget could do a better job with their 'Street Fleet' promotion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/budget-streetfleet.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-453" title="budget-streetfleet" src="http://observebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/budget-streetfleet.png" alt="" width="567" height="596" /></a></p>
<p>I have an intellectual interest in airlines, car rental companies and hotels. In all cases, the companies have made huge capital investments and have to eke out a living in a very competitive environment. Getting even an extra 1% from every customer is huge for these companies.</p>
<p>I was making the rounds of the car rental sites and came across this link for &#8216;Street Fleet&#8217;. Since I am always curious about product offerings, I clicked on it. Here is what I saw:</p>
<p>﻿<a href="http://observebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/budgetstreetfleet.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-454" title="budgetstreetfleet" src="http://observebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/budgetstreetfleet.png" alt="Budget's Street Fleet program" width="460" height="228" /></a></p>
<p>I read this and it made no sense to me. First, we start with the misspelling of the word &#8216;guaranteed&#8217;.</p>
<p>Then, I am trying to figure out what they are offering here. If I book a &#8216;Street Fleet&#8217; vehicle, apparently, I will get that vehicle when I arrive if it is available. Isn&#8217;t that how the entire rental car model works? How is this different?</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s silly how they say  &#8217;our reservable collection of makes and models&#8217; in one sentence and then say &#8216;if available&#8217;. Either it can be reserved  or not.</p>
<p>They say they have a Cadillac CTS or a Chrysler Crossfire-that is a definitely a good value proposition. These are unusual cars.  They just have to do a much better job of selling it. You can&#8217;t call a premium purchase &#8216;Street Fleet&#8217;. It should be something like &#8216;Prestige Collection&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://observebusiness.com/budget-rent-a-cars-confusing-street-fleet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robo-Call firm advertises on Google Mail</title>
		<link>http://observebusiness.com/robo-call-firm-advertises-on-google-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://observebusiness.com/robo-call-firm-advertises-on-google-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vicparekh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robo call]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observebusiness.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  A fascinating look into the turd-world of &#8220;direct calling&#8221;. I saw this ad on top of my gmail. For $3, these guys, Leads Direct Marketing will robo-call millions of people, and transfer the live lead to you. Having been robo-called a few times, I cannot emphasize how much I hate these people. Check out this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p>A fascinating look into the turd-world of &#8220;direct calling&#8221;.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-365" title="robocall2" src="http://observebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/robocall2.png" alt="robocall2" width="808" height="93" /></p>
<p>I saw this ad on top of my gmail. For $3, these guys, <a href="http://www.leadsdirectmarketing.com">Leads Direct Marketing</a> will robo-call millions of people, and transfer the live lead to you. Having been robo-called a few times, I cannot emphasize how much I hate these people.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.leadsdirectmarketing.com/samplegreetings.php">this page</a> where they list out all their &#8216;messages&#8217;. </p>
<p>In every ecosystem, there exists a class of animals whose job it is to traffick in filth. These guys, perform that job in our ecosystem.</p>
<p>The best way to beat these guys is to make sure you are on the Do-Not-Call Registry. Of course, the DNR has many many loopholes, but it is at least a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://observebusiness.com/robo-call-firm-advertises-on-google-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising paradox: the more you claim, the less we believe</title>
		<link>http://observebusiness.com/nobody-believes-this-school/</link>
		<comments>http://observebusiness.com/nobody-believes-this-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 03:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vicparekh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observebusiness.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many people think that this school has major problems? This is a case of where advertising is overdone. The more this school shouts out its qualifications, the less we believe it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/schoolsigns1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-114" title="schoolsigns1" src="http://observebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/schoolsigns1.png" alt="" width="201" height="242" /></a></p>
<p>How many people think that this school has major problems? This is a case of where advertising is overdone. The more this school shouts out its qualifications, the less we believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://observebusiness.com/nobody-believes-this-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dermitage (skin care product) on NYTimes</title>
		<link>http://observebusiness.com/dermitage-skin-care-product-on-nytimes/</link>
		<comments>http://observebusiness.com/dermitage-skin-care-product-on-nytimes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vicparekh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Stream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dermitage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observebusiness.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NYTimes is known for being the newspaper of record. But they are hurting and trying to make the transition into the digital age. Jason Calcanis, a man who made a lot of money on the Internet AFTER the 2001 bust, said newspapers are dead.  So does Henry Blodget, who was a big Internet muckety-muck, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://observebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dermitage2.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-18" title="dermitage2" src="http://observebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dermitage2.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="139" /></a></p>
<p>The NYTimes is known for being the newspaper of record. But they are hurting and trying to make the transition into the digital age. Jason Calcanis, a man who made a lot of money on the Internet AFTER the 2001 bust, said <a href="http://www.calacanis.com/2007/04/07/sam-zell-is-going-to-lose-billions-on-newspapers-and-the-washing/" target="_blank">newspapers are dead</a>.  <a href="http://www.internetoutsider.com/2007/08/paint-by-number.html" target="_blank">So does Henry Blodget</a>, who was a big Internet muckety-muck, fell into disgrace and has pulled off a triumphant return.</p>
<p>So what does this have to do with the ad above, which promotes a not-FDA-approved remedy for wrinkles? It purports to be able to turn a very wrinkly old woman into dewy-fresh young woman with no wrinkles.</p>
<p>The NYTimes paper version charges a lot of money for its ads and has top-notch advertisers such as the Fortune 100. The digital version has to make do with whatever it can scrape up from the bottom of the bucket. They don&#8217;t seem to be doing a very good job of targeting, either: I saw the ad, and I am not a woman. I don&#8217;t turn off my cookies, etc. I visit the business section and the travel section and the &#8216;world&#8217; section fo the NYTimes website. But wait&#8230;I don&#8217;t visit the sports section. So I probably got tagged as a woman. Oops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://observebusiness.com/dermitage-skin-care-product-on-nytimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ArsTechnica is a top site but showing Public Service Ads</title>
		<link>http://observebusiness.com/arstechnica-is-a-top-sitebut-showing-publi/</link>
		<comments>http://observebusiness.com/arstechnica-is-a-top-sitebut-showing-publi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vicparekh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ars technica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tough economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://observebusiness.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ArsTechnica is considered one of the top blogs on the Internet. It is ranked 2618 on Alexa and #7 on the top 100 blogs list on Technorati. But on a recent visit it was showing PSA&#8217;s(Public Service Announcements) all over its home page. That just shows how tough it is to make money on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_6" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 438px"><a href="http://observebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/arstechnica.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-6" title="arstechnica" src="http://observebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/arstechnica.jpg" alt="Top Site Arstechnica showing PSA" width="428" height="307" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Top Site Arstechnica showing PSA</p></div>
<p>ArsTechnica is considered one of the top blogs on the Internet. It is ranked <a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/arstechnica.com" target="_blank">2618 on Alexa</a> and #7 on the <a href="http://technorati.com/pop/blogs/" target="_blank">top 100 blogs list</a> on Technorati. But on a recent visit it was showing PSA&#8217;s(Public Service Announcements) all over its home page. That just shows how tough it is to make money on the Internet. Perhaps they should go talk to <a href="http://johnchow.com" target="_blank">John Chow</a> who claims to make mucho $$$ on the Internet blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://observebusiness.com/arstechnica-is-a-top-sitebut-showing-publi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

